How do you review the non-solicit clause in contracts?
As the examples below illustrate, non-solicit clauses may be found in sections that are clearly labeled as “Non-Solicit”, “Non-Solicitation”, etc., in which case they will be relatively easy to find. In other cases, however, such as examples 3 and 15 below, they may not be labeled at all; or, as is the case with example 9 below, non-solicitation language may be buried in the middle of a seemingly unrelated section, requiring careful review to spot.
After locating all the non-solicit language in each agreement, key things to focus on when reviewing these provisions include:
Who is restricted
The class of restricted persons will, of course, include the grantor. However, the clause may also prohibit the grantor’s subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, agents, etc. from soliciting the beneficiary’s stakeholders.
Often, the clause will make this clear, including through the use of defined terms such as “Affiliates” or “Representatives” (see, for instance, examples 3 and 4 below). Be sure to check the definition(s) of any such term(s) to ensure that the full class of persons covered by the non-solicit clause is ascertained.
Applicable stakeholders
The non-solicit clause may apply only to a particular kind of stakeholder (examples 2, 5 and 8 below, for instance, apply only to employees) or it may apply to a broad range of stakeholders (see, for instance, examples 13 and 15 below).
Factors that influence the range of applicable stakeholders include the nature of the agreement and the protection that the beneficiary hopes to secure through the clause. Note as well that the class of applicable stakeholders may not be restricted to stakeholders of the beneficiary only; it may also include, for example, stakeholders of the beneficiary’s affiliates.
Regardless of whether the clause applies to many different stakeholders or a particular type of stakeholder, it is important to consider whether the scope is reasonable. Example 2, for instance, prohibits solicitation of “any senior scientist, member of senior management or any other individual who is or was employed by Seller or its Affiliates”. Although the scope here is relatively narrow, having both current and former employees of Seller or its Affiliates as part of the class of employees that the grantor cannot solicit could potentially be considered too restrictive and may therefore affect the enforceability of the clause.
Exceptions
Non-solicit clauses may include specific exceptions to the general limitations they impose. These exceptions are typically included for practical purposes and to ensure the clause is not overly restrictive. Examples 2, 3 and 4 below, for instance, all have exceptions for hiring activities that are not specifically aimed at employees covered by the clause.
In these examples, the purpose of the non-solicit clause is to prevent the grantor from approaching employees of the beneficiary to offer them employment elsewhere; however, if the grantor was also prevented from hiring an employee of the beneficiary who responded to an advertisement for an open position that was aimed at the general public, the clause could potentially be considered too restrictive.
Duration
Most non-solicit clauses have limited duration. In commercial agreements, the clause will generally apply for the term of the agreement and may survive for a number of months or years thereafter (see, for instance, examples 2, 5 and 6 below).
Non-solicit clauses in employment agreements often remain valid for up to one year (and typically no more than two years) following the termination of employment.
In purchase agreements, the clause will typically remain in force for a specified period following the closing date of the transaction (or alternatively the effective date of the agreement).
Where the duration is expressed as a defined term - see, for instance, “Restricted Period” in example 12 below and “Noncompete Period” in example 13 below - be sure to check the definition of any such term to confirm the period over which the non-solicit clause applies.
Geographic restrictions
The scope of non-solicit clauses may also be limited to a particular geographic area. Section 7.3(2) of example 5, below, for instance, prevents Parent from offering employment in Canada to certain employees of the Fund Manager. Like other aspects of the non-solicit clause, it is important to consider the specificity and reasonableness of any such geographic restriction.
Impact of other provisions
As with the review of any contractual provision, it’s also important to be aware of other provisions that may affect the interpretation of non-solicit clauses. Defined terms, for example, were mentioned in points 1 and 4 above.
The term clause (and also the renewal clause) provides important information about the term of the agreement, which may be relevant to the duration of a non-solicit clause.
Finally, as mentioned above, enforceability is an issue that regularly affects non-solicit clauses. The enforceability of these clauses typically depends on both the facts and circumstances of each contract as well as applicable law. The governing law section states which jurisdiction’s laws apply to the agreement, and that information can help parties evaluate potential issues with the enforceability of a given non-solicit clause.